Logic pro plugins torque upgrade#

If I may ask politely - what does this answer bring to the subject? This is already given in the title. In any case, there is little information about this ECU out there we are trying to get the basic understanding of how this particular ECU differs from the better known ME instances, and where the fine points are. I think he just might be protecting his business. On the other hand, looking at the map definitions and comparing it to the available ME documents, the general principle of this ECU and basic tuning does not seem to be that complex as the above mentioned person would try to make you believe.

Logic pro plugins torque upgrade#

hammersword known on another forum (perhaps he is around here too) tries to convince everybody that this ECU is very complex, and in a way he might be right - the factory maps and parameters that upgrade the 155hp version of Fiat Grande Punto to the 180hp Abarth go way over 400 items. And a very detailed intake manifold and valve duration model.

The question of the OP is very valid, because this ECU is newer than the commonly known ME 7.1 / 7.3 around here, it is similar to MED9, but in many ways different, and in particular in the fact there is *really no load* in a sense - Fiat chose in most of their gasoline engines not to employ a MAF, so this ECU is based solely on two MAP sensors on the two sides of the throttle for load estimation.

Torque managed ECU instead of load managed ECU. But in the meantime you could try to share your findings since June ) If I come up with a good candidate what blocks your boost at higher revs I will let you know here. And yes, there is no maps similar to ones mentioned here a lot for the older ME-s. (BTW, I do own a 120 hp t-jet, but I am nowhere near being able to play with it live), but there is a couple of other torque and pressure watchers and limiters that may interfere with this. Second, yes, to me it also seems that raising MDMAXNMOT should do the trick in most part. And I was also looking for corresponding maps in other bins to compare.įirst thing to note, this ME7.9.10 definition has unfortunately mistakes, so you have to take everything you see there with a grain of salt. But at least you get a friendly soul, because I also try to understand the workings of this ECU and I studied the same WinOLS definition as you did I believe (there is only one out there). Post by: woj on October 21, 2016, 11:53:54 AMĬan't really give you a straight answer, and I am also not a very active member of this forum (any questions I had so far were not answered). Title: Re: ME7.9.10 - Understanding the torque model I would very much appreciate any help at understanding the torque model of the ME7.9.10 as there is absolutely no info on the web. After addressing that ill take care of the fueling and ignition. My first aim is to raise boost to ~1.3 Bar and make a flat and wide as possible torque curve. I also measured WGDC and its at 55-60% at 4000RPM, so I dont think its a hardware issue. The requested torque seems to be high enough (not by logging). This means i cant use the strategy you people use on the ME7 - although there seem to be some similarities.Īs of now I tried raising the torque limiters and got the boost up to 1.25 at low revs, but it lowers down to stock 0.8-0.9 by 3500-4000RPM. I couldnt find any map relating max load like LDRXN or KFLDHBN, only torque limiters, so it seems this ECU has a different torque model than ME7? (Based on torque and not load i guess). MDMAXNMOT Max indicated Trq for power limit KFMDBGRK Max torque for clutch protection KLMIMAX Characteristic maximum indicated torque I found many relevant maps using a damos of an alfa mito 135 (same Tjet motor) - torque, ignition and lambda related.

Im currently struggling to understand my fiat bravo tjet 1.4 torque model. Hi to all (my 1st real question/subject.)